Jim Kopas Blog
Home > Investments > Another Promising Sign for A Continued Market Recovery

Another Promising Sign for A Continued Market Recovery

September 14th, 2009

 On June 23rd the 50 Day Moving Average for the S&P 500 crossed above the 200 Day Moving Average for the first time since December 2007.  On Friday, September 4th, the 50 Day M.A. was 10% above the 200 Day M.A. for the first time since April 20th 1999.  This is just the 19th time that the 50 Day M.A. has surpassed the 200 Day M.A. by 10% since 1954, and is another promising sign for a continued market recovery.

Historically, the S&P 500 was higher (on average) 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 1 year later when the 50 Day M.A. crosses 10% above the 200 Day M.A.  In fact, the S&P 500 was higher one year later in 14 out of the 18 occurrences (roughly 78% of the time), with an average gain of 12.32%.

50 DMA vs. 200 DMACourtesy of Dorsey Wright and Associates

 

I decided to cross reference the results of the Moving Average Performance to one of  Pring Turner Capital Group’s  stock timing models (See Last Weeks Post), to see how the market responded when the 50 Day M.A. crossed 10% above the 200 Day M.A. and the timing model was issuing a buy signal (similar to current market conditions).  The results were impressive, as the S&P 500 was higher one year later in 11 out of the 12 occurrences (more then 91% of the time), with an average gain of 15.69%.

50 DMA vs. 200 DMA. Timing

None of the information or opinions expressed within this website shall constitute an offer to sell or solicitation or an offer to buy any securities. Pring Turner Capital Group does not guarantee the suitability, accuracy, or completeness of any content or links provided on this site. No information should be interpreted to imply that past results or performance is an indication of future performance. Use of information is at the readers sole risk and Pring Turner Capital Group will have no responsibility or liability under any subject matter on this website.

Jim Kopas Investments

  1. Douglas Pryor
    September 23rd, 2009 at 14:55 | #1

    Good statistical info. Let’s hope it doesn’t reflect the 1987 numbers.

  1. No trackbacks yet.